CVE-2011-1526
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
It was found that ftpd, a Kerberos-aware FTP server, did not properly drop privileges. On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, the ftpd daemon did not check for the potential failure of the krb5_setegid() function call. On systems where the set real, set effective, or set saved group ID system calls might fail, a remote FTP user could use this flaw to gain unauthorized read or write access to files that were owned by the root group.
Statement
This issue was addressed in krb5-appl packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 via RHSA-2011:0920 and krb5 packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 via RHSA-2012:0306.
This issue is not planned to be addressed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, where this issue was rated as having low security impact.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 711419: krb5-appl: ftpd incorrect group privilege dropping (MITKRB5-SA-2011-005)
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2011-1526
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1526
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1526
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | krb5 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | krb5 | Fixed | RHSA-2012:0306 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | krb5-appl | Fixed | RHSA-2011:0920 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v2 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v2 Base Score | 5.5 | 6.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Access Complexity | Low | Low |
| Authentication | Single | Single |
| Confidentiality Impact | Partial | Partial |
| Integrity Impact | Partial | Partial |
| Availability Impact | None | Partial |
CVSS v2 Vector
Red Hat AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N
NVD AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank MIT Kerberos project for reporting this issue. Upstream acknowledges Tim Zingelman as the original reporter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.