CVE-2016-3737
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
It was discovered that sending specially crafted HTTP request to the JON server would allow deserialization of that message without authentication. An attacker could use this flaw to cause remote code execution.
Statement
It is not feasible to correct this issue with a code change as client SSL certificates need to be created in order to support client authentication. The installation documentation notes how to mitigate this through the creation of certificates to support SSL authentication. This mitigation is the best way to correct this issue and, as a result, we will not be releasing any patches to correct the issue.
Mitigation
Apply the configuration changes described in the documentation here: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_Operations_Network/3.3/html/Admin_and_Config/JBoss_ON_and_SSL-Authentication.html
For more information, refer to https://access.redhat.com/articles/2570101.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1333618: JON: The agent/server communication deserializes data, and does not require authentication
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2016-3737
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3737
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-3737
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat JBoss Operations Network 3 | Core Server | Will not fix |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v2 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v2 Base Score | 9 | 9 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Access Complexity | Low | Low |
| Authentication | None | None |
| Confidentiality Impact | Partial | Partial |
| Integrity Impact | Partial | Partial |
| Availability Impact | Complete | Complete |
CVSS v2 Vector
Red Hat AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:C
NVD AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:C
Acknowledgements
This issue was discovered by Jason Shepherd (Red Hat).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended)
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists)
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.