CVE-2018-1088
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A privilege escalation flaw was found in gluster snapshot scheduler. Any gluster client allowed to mount gluster volumes could also mount shared gluster storage volume and escalate privileges by scheduling malicious cronjob via symlink.
Statement
This vulnerability affects gluster servers that have, or have previously had, Gluster volume snapshot scheduling enabled from the CLI. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization supports volume snapshot scheduling from the Web UI, which uses a distinct mechanism that is not subject to this vulnerability. VM snapshots are not impacted by this flaw. For more information, please see the Vulnerability Article linked under External References.
This issue did not affect the versions of glusterfs as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, and 7 because only gluster client is shipped in these products. CVE-2018-1088 affects glusterfs-server package as shipped with Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.
Mitigation
To limit exposure of gluster server nodes :
1. gluster server should be on LAN and not reachable from public networks.
2. Use gluster auth.allow and auth.reject.
3. Use TLS certificates between gluster server nodes and clients.
Caveat: This would only mitigate attacks from unauthorized malicious clients. gluster clients allowed by auth.allow or having signed TLS client certificates would still be able to trigger this attack.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1558721: glusterfs: Privilege escalation via gluster_shared_storage when snapshot scheduling is enabled
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2018-1088
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1088
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1088
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native Client for RHEL 6 for Red Hat Storage | glusterfs | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1137 |
| Native Client for RHEL 7 for Red Hat Storage | glusterfs | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1136 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | glusterfs | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | glusterfs | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6 | glusterfs | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1137 |
| Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 7 | glusterfs | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1136 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | glusterfs | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1136 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | redhat-release-virtualization-host | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1275 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | redhat-virtualization-host | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1275 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | imgbased | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1524 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | ovirt-node-ng | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1524 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | redhat-release-virtualization-host | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1524 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | redhat-virtualization-host | Fixed | RHSA-2018:1524 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Attack Vector | Adjacent Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Changed | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Acknowledgements
This issue was discovered by John Strunk (Red Hat).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.