CVE-2019-1002101
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Kubernetes via the mishandling of symlinks when copying files from a running container. An attacker could exploit this by convincing a user to use kubectl cp or oc cp with a malicious container, allowing for arbitrary files to be overwritten on the host machine.
Statement
This issue affects Kubernetes starting from version 1.9. OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) versions 3.9 and later are also affected.
This issue did not affect the version of Kubernetes(embedded in heketi) shipped with Red Hat Gluster Storage 3 as it does not contain the vulnerable code.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1685213: kubernetes: Mishandling of symlinks allows for arbitrary file write via `kubectl cp`
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-1002101
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1002101
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1002101
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | atomic-enterprise-service-catalog | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | atomic-openshift | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | atomic-openshift-descheduler | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | atomic-openshift-dockerregistry | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | atomic-openshift-node-problem-detector | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | atomic-openshift-web-console | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | openshift-ansible | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | openshift-enterprise-cluster-capacity | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | python-libcloud | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.10 | rubygem-fluent-plugin-viaq_data_model | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0620 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-enterprise-service-catalog | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift-cluster-autoscaler | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift-descheduler | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift-dockerregistry | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift-metrics-server | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift-node-problem-detector | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift-service-idler | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift-web-console | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | golang-github-openshift-oauth-proxy | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | golang-github-prometheus-alertmanager | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | golang-github-prometheus-prometheus | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | openshift-ansible | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | openshift-enterprise-autoheal | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | openshift-enterprise-cluster-capacity | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | python-certifi | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | python-docker | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | python-libcloud | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | rubygem-fluent-plugin-viaq_data_model | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0636 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.4 | atomic-openshift | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.5 | atomic-openshift | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.6 | atomic-openshift | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.7 | atomic-openshift | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 | ansible-service-broker | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0619 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 | atomic-openshift | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0619 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 | atomic-openshift-dockerregistry | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0619 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 | atomic-openshift-web-console | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0619 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 | cri-o | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0619 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 | golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0619 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 | openshift-ansible | Fixed | RHBA-2019:0619 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Storage 3 | heketi | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.3 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | Required | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Ariel Zelivansky (Twistlock) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.