CVE-2019-10222
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the Ceph RGW configuration with Beast as the front end handling client requests. An unauthenticated attacker could crash the Ceph RGW server by sending valid HTTP headers and terminating the connection, resulting in a remote denial of service for Ceph RGW clients.
Statement
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 included some Ceph components at release for in order to support ppc64le. The version provided in the OpenStack repositories is outdated and customers are expected to be using versions provided in Ceph repositories now. Additionally, only the client side and libraries were included which are not affected by this vulnerability.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue either of the following options can be applied to system:
Mitigation 1:
1. By default system will use /etc/init.d/ceph-radosgw
stop this service by
~]# /etc/init.d/ceph-radosgw stop
2. Create systemd service, and change command line parameters according to the environment
where Ceph radosgw is running.
~]# cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/ceph-rgw.service
[Unit]
Description=Ceph RGW daemon
[Service]
Type=forking
ExecStart=/bin/radosgw -n client.rgw.$(HOSTNAME REDACTED)
Restart=on-abnormal
RestartSec=1s
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
3. Run systemd service 'ceph-rgw.service'
Caveat: It still takes +1-2 sec to get service back online. After applying above mentioned mitigation, the malicious IP can be blocked by a firewall rule if there are continuous attempts to launch remote denial of service. This mitigation is of limited use if the attack is launched from multiple IPs. It is recommended to limit the exposure of ceph RGW server to known clients.
OR
Mitigation 2:
use 'civetweb' as HTTP frontend with ceph RGW.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1739292: ceph: Unauthenticated clients can crash ceph RGW configured with beast as frontend
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-10222
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10222
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10222
Content from tracker.ceph.com is not included.https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/40018
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 | ceph | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 for Ubuntu | ceph | Fixed | RHSA-2019:2579 |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 3.3 | ceph | Fixed | RHSA-2019:2577 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | ceph-common | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ceph | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | ceph | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Abhishek Lekshmanan (SUSE Software Solutions Germany) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.