CVE-2019-12749
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in dbus. The implementation of DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 is susceptible to a symbolic link attack. A malicious client with write access to its own home directory could manipulate a ~/.dbus-keyrings symlink to cause the DBusServer to read and write in unintended locations resulting in an authentication bypass. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
Statement
This flaw is mitigated by the fact that by default, the well-known system dbus-daemon (since 2003) and the well-known session dbus-daemon (in stable releases since dbus 1.10.0 in 2015) only accept the EXTERNAL authentication mechanism, and as a result will reject DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 at an early stage, before manipulating cookies.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is affected by this flaw, which can be leveraged to achieve privilege escalation via upstart. This issue has been rated as having important impact for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and 8, both ship dbus >= 1.10 and therefore are affected by this flaw only when system or session dbus-daemons are used under non-standard configurations or by third party users of DBusServer. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and 8 does not ship any affected DBusServer cosumer. However third party applications may be affected.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1719344: dbus: DBusServer DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 authentication bypass
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-287: Improper Authentication
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-12749
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12749
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12749
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | dbus | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | dbus | Fixed | RHSA-2019:1726 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.5 Advanced Update Support | dbus | Fixed | RHSA-2019:2870 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.6 Advanced Update Support | dbus | Fixed | RHSA-2019:2868 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | dbus | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4032 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | dbus | Fixed | RHSA-2019:3707 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Do | openshiftdo/odo-init-image-rhel7 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0949 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7 | 7.1 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank the D-Bus project for reporting this issue. Upstream acknowledges Joe Vennix (Apple Information Security) as the original reporter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.