CVE-2019-14858
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in ansible. When a module has an argument_spec with sub parameters marked as no_log, passing an invalid parameter name to the module will cause the task to fail before the no_log options in the sub parameters are processed. As a result, data in the sub parameter fields will not be masked and will be displayed if Ansible is run with increased verbosity and present in the module invocation arguments for the task.
Statement
Fixes for Red Hat OpenStack Platform (RHOSP) have been set to 'Moderate' because flaw exploitation requires running Ansible with increased verbosity which is not the RHOSP deployment default.
Red Hat Gluster Storage no longer maintains its own version of Ansible. The fix will be provided from core Ansible.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1760593: ansible: sub parameters marked as no_log are not masked in certain failure scenarios
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-215: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-14858
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14858
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-14858
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| CloudForms Management Engine 5 | ansible | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2 for RHEL 7 | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2019:3207 |
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2 for RHEL 8 | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2019:3207 |
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.6 for RHEL 7 | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2019:3201 |
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.7 for RHEL 7 | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2019:3202 |
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.8 for RHEL 7 | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2019:3203 |
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.8 for RHEL 8 | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2019:3203 |
| Red Hat Ansible Tower 3 | ansible | Affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 | ansible | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 | ansible | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 10 (Newton) | ansible | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13.0 (Queens) | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2020:0756 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13.0 (Queens) for RHEL 7.6 EUS | ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2020:0756 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 14 (Rocky) | ansible | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6 | ansible | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Storage 3 | ansible | Will not fix |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | Required | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Acknowledgements
This issue was discovered by Sam Doran (Red Hat).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.