CVE-2019-1551
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An integer overflow was found in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. As per upstream:
-
No EC algorithms are affected.
-
Attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely.
-
Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway.
-
Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME
Statement
Accelerated modular exponentiation for Intel processors (RSAZ) was introduced in openssl-1.0.2, therefore older versions of OpenSSL are not affected by this flaw.
Mitigation
For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, 512 bit DH is already disabled. As this bug is about leakage of the private key to the attacker, it should be fully sufficient to just not use 1024 bit RSA keys or 1024 bit DSA keys. These keys are not secure enough anyway. 3-prime RSA keys are not supported on RHEL-7.
For Red Hat Enterprise 8, The DEFAULT crypto policy already disables all these key sizes.
Also applications compiled with openssl which use the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME, other users of this API are not affected by this flaw.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1780995: openssl: Integer overflow in RSAZ modular exponentiation on x86_64
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-1551
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1551
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1551
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10575
Content from www.openssl.org is not included.https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20191206.txt
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-apr | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-apr-util | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-brotli | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-curl | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-jansson | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_cluster-native | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_http2 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_md | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_security | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-nghttp2 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6 | jbcs-httpd24-openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-apr | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-apr-util | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-brotli | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-curl | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-httpd | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-jansson | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_cluster-native | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_http2 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_md | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-mod_security | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-nghttp2 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 | jbcs-httpd24-openssl-chil | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4384 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | openssl097a | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | openssl098e | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | openssl | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | openssl098e | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | compat-openssl10 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4514 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | openssl | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server 2 | openssl | Out of support scope | |
| Text-Only JBCS | openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4383 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 4.8 | 5.3 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | Low |
| Integrity Impact | Low | None |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
This attack works with 512-bit moduli DH, however, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not a recommended crypto practice. Therefore this flaw has been classified as having high attack complexity. (AC:H)
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.