CVE-2019-16786
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An HTTP-interpretation flaw was found in waitress which did not properly validate incoming HTTP headers. When parsing the Transfer-Encoding header, waitress would look only for a single string value. According to the HTTP standard, Transfer-Encoding should be a comma-separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with 'chunked'. Because of this flaw, requests sent with: "Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked" would get ignored, and waitress would use the Content-Length header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to force waitress to accept potentially bad HTTP requests or treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining.
Statement
All affected Red Hat products ship but do not use the flawed version of python-waitress. The impact for these products is therefore rated as having a security impact of Low.
In Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13, because the flawed code is not used and the fix would require a substantial amount of development, no update will be provided at this time for the RHOSP13 python-waitress package.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1791415: waitress: HTTP request smuggling through invalid Transfer-Encoding
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-16786
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16786
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16786
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 | python-waitress | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 4 | python-waitress | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | python-waitress | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 15.0 (Stein) | python-waitress | Fixed | RHSA-2020:0720 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16 (Train) | python-waitress | Affected | |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/clair-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-bridge-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-bridge-operator-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-builder-qemu-rhcos-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-builder-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-container-security-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-container-security-operator-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-openshift-bridge-rhel8-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-operator-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:0420 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.1 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Changed | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | None |
| Integrity Impact | Low | High |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.