CVE-2019-18634
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the Sudo application when the ’pwfeedback' option is set to true on the sudoers file. An authenticated user can use this vulnerability to trigger a stack-based buffer overflow under certain conditions even without Sudo privileges. The buffer overflow may allow an attacker to expose or corrupt memory information, crash the Sudo application, or possibly inject code to be run as a root user.
Statement
This flaw can only be exploited if the option pwfeedback is enabled in sudo configuration. This option is not enabled by default in any version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
The sudo packages distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions are compiled using gcc's stack-protector feature. The "Stack Smashing Protection" may help mitigate code execution attacks for this flaw.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 is not affected as it doesn't include the commit which introduced the vulnerability.
Mitigation
Please follow the steps bellow as mitigation:
1. Check the default properties set for sudo by running:
$ sudo -l
[sudo] password for user:
Matching Defaults entries for users on localhost:
!visiblepw, pwfeedback, always_set_home, match_group_by_gid, always_query_group_plugin, env_reset, env_keep="COLORS DISPLAY HOSTNAME HISTSIZE KDEDIR LS_COLORS",
env_keep+="MAIL PS1 PS2 QTDIR USERNAME LANG LC_ADDRESS LC_CTYPE", env_keep+="LC_COLLATE LC_IDENTIFICATION
LC_MEASUREMENT LC_MESSAGES", env_keep+="LC_MONETARY LC_NAME LC_NUMERIC LC_PAPER LC_TELEPHONE", env_keep+="LC_TIME LC_ALL LANGUAGE LINGUAS _XKB_CHARSET XAUTHORITY", secure_path=/sbin\:/bin\:/usr/sbin\:/usr/bin
2. If `pwfeedback` is enabled as shown above, edit your `/etc/sudoers` file, changing the line:
Defaults pwfeedback
To:
Defaults !pwfeedback
This will disable visual feedback on password typing, making sure the attack is not possible anymore.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1796944: sudo: Stack based buffer overflow when pwfeedback is enabled
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-18634
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18634
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18634
Content from www.sudo.ws is not included.https://www.sudo.ws/alerts/pwfeedback.html
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | sudo | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2020:0726 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2020:0540 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2020:0487 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2020:0509 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.