CVE-2020-0551
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Intel's microprocessors. Intel microprocessors contain an implementation weakness that allows for an 'inverse MDS' style attack to be performed during store operations (writes to memory) and are stuffed maliciously into microarchitectural buffers from which unsuspecting victim code will later (speculatively) execute them. This allows an attacker to control and steer (speculative) execution, possibly allowing them to exploit gadgets in existing code to leak sensitive data. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.
Statement
CVE-2020-0551 is the CVE assigned specifically to the hardware implementation leading to this flaw. Unlike the L1TF microarchitectural issue, no additional CVE have been assigned at this time to cover operating systems or vmm/hypervisor specific implementations.
As this CVE is a flaw in specific hardware, not the operating system kernel, and operating system mitigations are already applied, Red Hat does not list the Red Hat Enterprise Linux kernel package as “affected” by this CVE.
This does not imply that the flaw can not be exposed on systems running Red Hat Enterprise Linux on vulnerable hardware, only that the flaws exist in the hardware implementation and no additional changes are deemed necessary or practical to address this flaw at the software layer.
Existing mitigations released in Red Hat Enterprise Linux in response to Spectre V1 (This content is not included.https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/speculativeexecution), L1TF (This content is not included.https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/L1TF) and MDS (This content is not included.https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/mds) should already provide significant barrier against exploitation of this attack vector and no new mitigation is planned at this time.
Mitigation
For hardware vulnerable to these attacks, there is no known mitigation other than to upgrade to hardware that is not vulnerable to this flaw.
Due to the high level of difficulty of the attack, and the performance impact which would be associated with any potential mitigations, there are currently no microcode or software mitigations for this issue other than previously existing Spectre V1 and SMAP mitigations described above.
Red Hat doesn't currently have knowledge of any real-world occurrences of this attack, so the risk of attack may be considered low. To further minimize the possibility of attacks related to this and other speculative issues, trusted and untrusted workloads can be isolated on separate systems.
For further details about potential mitigations, see Intel's LVI deep dive whitepaper (This content is not included.https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-load-value-injection).
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1753463: hw: Load Value Injection
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-440->Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-385: Expected Behavior Violation leads to Covert Timing Channel
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-0551
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0551
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0551
https://access.redhat.com/articles/load-value-injection-flaw
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2 | kernel | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 3.3 | 5.6 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | High |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Changed |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Intel and industry partners for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended)
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists)
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.