CVE-2020-11078
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in python-httplib2. An attacker controlling an unescaped part of uri for httplib2.Http.request() could change request headers and body, send additional hidden requests to same server. This vulnerability impacts software that uses httplib2 with uri constructed by string concatenation, as opposed to proper urllib building with escaping.
Statement
While Red Hat Quay 3.0, and 3.1 used the httplib2 library it was removed in versions 3.2 and later. Upgrade to 3.2 or later to fix this vulnerability in Red Hat Quay.
Red Hat Gluster Storage 3 delivers the affected version of the python-httplib2 library. However the library is not used by Gluster hence the impact by this vulnerability is low.
This issue affects the version of the python-httplib2 library as shipped with Red Hat Ceph Storage (RHCS) version 2. Ceph-2 has reached End of Extended Life Cycle Support and no longer fixing moderates/lows.
There's currently no known vector to exploit this when using Python versions with CVE-2019-9740 and CVE-2019-9947 fixed.
In Red Hat OpenStack Platform13, because the flaw has a lower impact and the package's indirect usage in RHOSP cannot be exploited, no update will be provided at this time for the RHOSP python-httplib2 package.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1845937: python-httplib2: CRLF injection via an attacker controlled unescaped part of uri for httplib2.Http.request function
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-11078
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11078
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11078
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2 | python-httplib2 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Ansible Tower 3 | python-httplib2 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 | python-httplib2 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | fence-agents | Fixed | RHSA-2020:5003 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | resource-agents | Fixed | RHSA-2020:5004 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python-httplib2 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | resource-agents | Fixed | RHSA-2020:4605 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 10 (Newton) | python-httplib2 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | python-httplib2 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1 | python-httplib2 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2116 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | python-httplib2 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Storage 3 | python-httplib2 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 3 for Cloud Providers | python-httplib2 | Fix deferred |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Changed | Changed |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.