CVE-2020-11100
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the way HAProxy processed certain HTTP/2 request packets. This flaw allows an attacker to send crafted HTTP/2 request packets, which cause memory corruption, leading to a crash or potential remote arbitrary code execution with the permissions of the user running HAProxy.
Statement
HAProxy packages shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7 do not contain support for HTTP/2; therefore, they are not affected by this flaw.
OpenShift Container Platform versions through 4.3 contain the vulnerable code; exploitation requires setting ROUTER_USE_HTTP2 in the OpenShift Ingress Operator, which is not currently possible. The impact of this vulnerability is therefore reduced in OCP 4.x, prior to version 4.4, to low.
OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 added a configuration option to ose-haproxy-router that made enabling HTTP/2 support easy. However, it is not enabled by default on that version.
Mitigation
This issue can be mitigated by not enabling support for HTTP/2 protocol. Upstream suggests that HTTP/2 can be enabled per front-end server by using the following documentation: This content is not included.https://www.haproxy.com/documentation/hapee/1-8r1/traffic-management/enable-http2-protocol/.
You can check if http2 is enabled by searching your haproxy configuration files for a line containing 'h2'.
To mitigate this vulnerability in OpenShift Container Platform 3.11, keep HTTP/2 disabled as it is by default. You can verify if HTTP/2 support is enabled or not by following the instructions in following article: This content is not included.https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/haproxy
On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, haproxy is confined by SELinux, which should mitigate remote arbitrary code execution.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1819111: haproxy: malformed HTTP/2 requests can lead to out-of-bounds writes
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-20->Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-787: Improper Input Validation leads to Out-of-bounds Write
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-11100
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11100
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11100
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | haproxy | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | haproxy | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1288 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions | haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1289 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1287 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.4 | haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1936 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-haproxy18-haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1290 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5 EUS | rh-haproxy18-haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1290 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 EUS | rh-haproxy18-haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1290 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-haproxy18-haproxy | Fixed | RHSA-2020:1290 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank the HAProxy project for reporting this issue. Upstream acknowledges Felix Wilhelm (Google Project Zero) as the original reporter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.