CVE-2020-23922
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in giflib. A missing check in function DumpScreen2RGB in gif2rgb.c leads to an out-of-bounds read, allowing an attacker to crash the gif2rgb tool. The issue is not in the giflib library, but in the gif2rgb utility program.
Statement
This issue did not affect the versions of giflib as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 as they did not include the gif2rgb tool.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1953004: giflib: out-of-bounds read in DumpScreen2RGB() in gif2rgb.c in gif2rgb tool
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-23922
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-23922
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23922
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4128 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | giflib | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | giflib | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | giflib | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | giflib | Affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | Required | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | None | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
Attack Vector set to Local (AV:L) because this is an issue in the command-line tool gif2rgb, thus the data does not reasonably come from the network. Availability set to None (A:N) because crashing a short-lived tool does not cause any harm as the tool would be terminated shortly after anyway.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended)
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists)
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.