CVE-2020-25097
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in squid. Due to improper validation while parsing the request URI, squid is vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling. This issue could allow a trusted client to perform an HTTP request smuggling attack and access services otherwise forbidden by squid. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.
Statement
This flaw is not tied to a specific proxy type (e.g., forward or reverse) and has been rated as having a security impact of Important. This flaw affects the versions of Squid as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and 8, and is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is now in Extended Life Phase of the support and maintenance life cycle. For additional information, refer to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/.
Mitigation
This flaw can be mitigated by setting the `uri_whitespace` directive in squid.conf to either:
uri_whitespace denyor
uri_whitespace encode
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1939925: squid: improper input validation may allow a trusted client to perform HTTP request smuggling
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-25097
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25097
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-25097
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | squid | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | squid34 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | squid | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1135 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | squid:4 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1979 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Extended Update Support | squid:4 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2025 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support | squid:4 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2025 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | squid | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Changed | Changed |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
The vulnerable component is the Squid proxy itself while the impacted component is any user who is unknowingly attacked as a result of the HTTP request smuggling attack.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.