CVE-2020-25678
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Ceph where Ceph stores mgr module passwords in clear text. This issue can be found by searching the mgr logs for Grafana and dashboard, with passwords visible. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality.
Statement
-
Red Hat Ceph Storage 4 is affected by this flaw, with the passwords visible under sudo. Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 is not affected by this flaw, and does not log passwords by default.
-
Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage (RHOCS) 4 shipped Ceph package for the usage of RHOCS 4.2 only, that has reached End Of Life. Hence, the Ceph package is no longer used and supported with the release of RHOCS 4.3.
-
Red Hat OpenStack Platform deployments use the Ceph package directly from the Ceph channel; the RHOSP package will not be updated at this time.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1892109: ceph: mgr modules' passwords are in clear text in mgr logs
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-312: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-25678
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25678
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-25678
Content from tracker.ceph.com is not included.https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/37503
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 | ceph | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 | ceph | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 4.2 | ceph | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1452 |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 4.2 | ceph-ansible | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1452 |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 4.2 | gperftools | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1452 |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 4.2 | tcmu-runner | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1452 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ceph | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | ceph | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | ceph | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Openshift Container Storage 4 | ceph | Out of support scope |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | High | High |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
Attack vector is local as file permissions protect the file, even though sudo is required to exploit this flaw with standard permissions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.