CVE-2020-36185
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in jackson-databind. FasterXML mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
Statement
The following Red Hat products do ship the vulnerable component, but do not enable the unsafe conditions needed to exploit, lowering their vulnerability impact:
- JBoss Data Grid 7
- Business Process Management Suite 6
- Business Rules Management Suite 6
- JBoss Data Virtualization 6
- Red Hat Fuse Service Works 6
- Red Hat OpenStack Platform
- Red Hat OpenShift containers: ose-metering-hadoop, ose-metering-hive, ose-logging-elasticsearch5, ose-logging-elasticsearch6
These products may update the jackson-databind dependency in a future release.
In Red Hat Openshift 4 there are no plans to maintain the ose-logging-elasticsearch5 container, therefore it has been marked wontfix at this time and maybe fixed in a future update.
The following Red Hat products ship OpenDaylight, which contains the vulnerable jackson-databind, but do not expose jackson-databind in a way that would make it exploitable:
- Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 As such, Red Hat will not be providing a fix for OpenDaylight at this time.
The following Red Hat products are not affected by this flaw because they use a more recent version of jackson-databind that does not contain the vulnerable code:
- CodeReady Studio 12.16.0
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization
- Red Hat Satellite 6
- Red Hat OpenShift container: ose-metering-presto
Mitigation
The following conditions are needed for an exploit, we recommend avoiding all if possible:
* Deserialization from sources you do not control
* `enableDefaultTyping()`
* `@JsonTypeInfo using `id.CLASS` or `id.MINIMAL_CLASS`
* avoid: oadd.org.apache.commons.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.apache.commons.dbcp2.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.docx4j.org.apache.xalan.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource, com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.JNDIConnectionSource, com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.DriverManagerConnectionSource
in the classpath
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1913929: jackson-databind: mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-36185
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36185
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36185
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2998
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-MQ Clients 2 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| OpenShift Logging 5.0 | openshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1515 |
| Red Hat BPM Suite 6 | jackson-databind | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Data Grid 8 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Decision Manager 7 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | pki-deps:10.6/jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Integration Camel K 1 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Integration Service Registry | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss BRMS 6 | jackson-databind | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 7 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization 6 | jackson-databind | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse Service Works 6 | jackson-databind | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Application Runtimes | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | openshift3/ose-logging-elasticsearch5 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-metering-presto | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-metering-hadoop | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-metering-hive | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-logging-elasticsearch5 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 | openshift4/ose-logging-elasticsearch6 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1230 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 10 (Newton) | opendaylight | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | opendaylight | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Process Automation 7 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6 | candlepin | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus | jackson-databind | Not affected | |
| streams for Apache Kafka | jackson-databind | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
AC should be High because there are sufficient factors beyond the attacker's control:
- Accepts JSON content sent by untrusted client
- Has the “gadget” class oadd.org.apache.commons.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.apache.commons.dbcp2.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.cpdsadapter.DriverAdapterCPDS, org.docx4j.org.apache.xalan.lib.sql.JNDIConnectionPool, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp2.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource, org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource, com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.JNDIConnectionSource, com.newrelic.agent.deps.ch.qos.logback.core.db.DriverManagerConnectionSource in the Java classpath: and specifically the class works with Jackson
- Enable polymorphic type handling: objectMapper.enableDefaultTyping();
- Use version of Jackson that does not (yet) block “gadget” class br.com.anteros.dbcp.AnterosDBCPDataSource The vulnerability can be exploited only if all of these conditions are true. [1] This set of conditions, we feel reflects AC:H rather than AC:L. [1] Content from medium.com is not included.https://medium.com/@cowtowncoder/on-jackson-cves-dont-panic-here-is-what-you-need-to-know-54cd0d6e8062
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.