CVE-2020-36242
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A buffer-overflow flaw was found in the python-cryptography package. In certain sequences of update() calls when symmetrically encrypting very large payloads (>2GB) could result in an integer overflow, leading to buffer overflows. Note: This fix is a workaround for the OpenSSL CVE-2021-23840 flaw. Source: pyca/cryptography project
Statement
Triggering this flaw on in versions of python-cryptography as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 BaseOS, Appstream, as well as Red Hat Software Collections, can result in denial of service due to memory consumption or MemoryError exception.
In Red Hat OpenStack Platform, because the flaw has a lower impact and the fix would require a substantial amount of development, no update will be provided at this time for the RHOSP python-cryptography package.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1926226: python-cryptography: Large inputs for symmetric encryption can trigger integer overflow leading to buffer overflow
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-36242
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36242
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36242
Content from cryptography.io is not included.https://cryptography.io/en/latest/changelog.html#v3-3-2
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| CloudForms Management Engine 5 | python-cryptography | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 1.2 | cryptography | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 1.2 | python-cryptography | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ansible Engine 2 | python-cryptography | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Ansible Tower 3 | cryptography | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | python-cryptography | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python-cryptography | Fixed | RHSA-2021:1608 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python38:3.8/python-cryptography | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python39:3.9/python-cryptography | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | python-cryptography | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | python-cryptography | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-rhel8 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-python38-babel | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-python38-python | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-python38-python-cryptography | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-python38-python-jinja2 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-python38-python-lxml | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-python38-python-pip | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-python38-python-urllib3 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-python38-babel | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-python38-python | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-python38-python-cryptography | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-python38-python-jinja2 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-python38-python-lxml | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-python38-python-pip | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-python38-python-urllib3 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3254 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | redhat-virtualization-host | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2239 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
While there could be risk to data confidentiality in some configurations, it has not been demonstrated that triggering this flaw would cause total loss of confidentiality; the greatest impact is to availability. For this reason we've set C:L.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.