CVE-2020-36327
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the way Bundler determined the source repository when installing dependencies of source-restricted gem packages. In configurations that use multiple gem repositories and explicitly define from which source repository certain gems are to be installed, a dependency of a source-restricted gem could be installed form a different source if that repository provided higher version of the package. This could lead to installation of a malicious gem version and arbitrary code execution.
Statement
Red Hat Satellite does not ship RubyGem bundler, however, the product consumes it from the Red Hat Software Collections (RHSCL) repository.
Mitigation
This issue only affects configurations where gem packages are installed from multiple sources and the source repositories are explicitly defined for at least some gems. Dependencies of those source-restricted gems may be installed form a different repository, even if the same repository provides those dependencies, which is inconsistent with the intended behaviour described in the Bundler documentation. There are multiple possible approaches to mitigate this issue - customers should evaluate which approaches are usable in their environments.
* Explicitly define source for all dependency gems in the Gemfile configuration. When a dependency of a source-restricted gem is also to be installed form the same source, list such dependency explicitly in the Gemfile along with the specific source.
* Avoid configurations with multiple source repositories. When using a private repository for non-public gems, use the same private repository to mirror any content required from any public gem repository, such as RubyGems.org. When preparing such mirror, ensure that no mirrored gems have names conflicting with names of the internal non-public gems.
* Reserve internal package names in public repositories. For any internal private gem, also reserve the name in any public gem repository used, such as RubyGems.org. This will prevent attackers from registering those names and providing their malicious gems with higher versions.
Additional information about affected configurations can be found in the following Red Hat Knowledgebase article:
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1958999: rubygem-bundler: Dependencies of gems with explicit source may be installed from a different source
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-36327
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36327
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36327
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| CloudForms Management Engine 5 | rubygem-bundler | Will not fix | |
| Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift | ruby | Affected | |
| Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2 | rubygem-bundler | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rubygem-bundler | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ruby:2.7 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3020 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ruby:2.6 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0543 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ruby:2.5 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0545 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Update Services for SAP Solutions | ruby:2.5 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0548 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Update Services for SAP Solutions | ruby:2.6 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0581 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support | ruby:2.5 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0547 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support | ruby:2.6 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0582 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support | ruby:2.6 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0544 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support | ruby:2.5 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0546 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | ruby | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Software Collections | rh-ruby25-rubygem-bundler | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-ruby27-ruby | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3559 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-ruby30-ruby | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3982 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-ruby26-ruby | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0708 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-ruby27-ruby | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3559 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 EUS | rh-ruby30-ruby | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3982 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | Required | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.