CVE-2020-8557
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Kubernetes, where the amount of disk space the /etc/hosts file can use is unconstrained . This flaw can allow attacker-controlled pods to cause a denial of service if they have permission to write to the node's /etc/hosts file.
Statement
In OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) there is LocalStorageCapacityIsolation feature gate functionality which prevents a denial of service (DoS) attack on the node by writing to the ephemeral storage.This feature is disabled by default in OCP 3.11 and can be enabled as per [1]. Even with enabled LocalStorageCapacityIsolation feature gate, OCP is affected by this vulnerability, therefore it is recommended to enable the feature gate and also upgrade to an OCP version which has a fix for this vulnerability.
Mitigation
On OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) 3.11 and 4.x it's possible to set the allowPrivilegeEscalation Security Context Constraint to 'false' to prevent this. Note that this is set to 'true' by default, and setting it to false will prevent certain binaries which require setuid to stop working. On OCP 3.11 for example the 'ping' command will no longer work [1]. On OCP 4.x and later the 'ping' command will work with allowPrivilegeEscalation set to False, but other setuid binaries will not work.
[1] This page is not included, but the link has been rewritten to point to the nearest parent document.https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.11/release_notes/ocp_3_11_release_notes.html
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1835977: kubernetes: Node disk DOS by writing to container /etc/hosts
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-8557
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8557
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8557
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | atomic-openshift | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3915 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.3 | openshift | Fixed | RHSA-2020:3808 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.3 | openshift4/ose-hyperkube | Fixed | RHSA-2020:3809 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.4 | openshift | Fixed | RHSA-2020:3579 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.4 | openshift4/ose-hyperkube | Fixed | RHSA-2020:3580 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.5 | openshift | Fixed | RHSA-2020:3519 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.5 | openshift4/ose-hyperkube | Fixed | RHSA-2020:3520 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank the Kubernetes Product Security Committee for reporting this issue. Upstream acknowledges Kebe Liu (DaoCloud) as the original reporter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.