CVE-2020-9484
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A deserialization flaw was discovered in Apache Tomcat's use of a FileStore. Under specific circumstances, an attacker can use a specially crafted request to trigger Remote Code Execution through deserialization of the file under their control. The highest threat from the vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
Statement
In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Red Hat Certificate System 10 and Identity Management are using the pki-servlet-engine component, which embeds a vulnerable version of Tomcat. However, in these specific contexts, the prerequisites to the vulnerability are not met. The PersistentManager is not set, and a SecurityManager is used. The use of pki-servlet-engine outside of these contexts is not supported. As a result, the vulnerability can not be triggered in supported configurations of these products. A future update may update Tomcat in pki-servlet-engine.
Red Hat Satellite do not ship Tomcat and rather use its configuration. The product is not affected because configuration does not make use of PersistanceManager or FileStore. Tomcat updates can be obtain from Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) RHSA.
Mitigation
Users may configure the PersistenceManager with an appropriate value for sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter to ensure that only application provided attributes are serialized and deserialized. For more details about the configuration, refer to the Apache Tomcat 9 Configuration Reference This content is not included.https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-9.0-doc/config/manager.html.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1838332: tomcat: deserialization flaw in session persistence storage leading to RCE
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-9484
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9484
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-9484
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Decision Manager 7 | tomcat | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | tomcat6 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2529 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2530 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | pki-deps:10.6/pki-servlet-engine | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Fuse 7.11 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:5532 | |
| Red Hat Fuse 7.9 | tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3140 |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 6 | jbossweb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization 6 | jbossweb | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | jbossweb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6 | tomcat | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server (JWS) 5.3 | tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2509 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3 for RHEL 6 | tomcat-native | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2483 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3 for RHEL 6 | tomcat7 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2483 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3 for RHEL 6 | tomcat8 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2483 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3 for RHEL 7 | tomcat-native | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2483 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3 for RHEL 7 | tomcat7 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2483 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3 for RHEL 7 | tomcat8 | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2483 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3.1 | tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2487 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3 on RHEL 6 | jws5-tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2506 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3 on RHEL 6 | jws5-tomcat-native | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2506 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3 on RHEL 7 | jws5-tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2506 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3 on RHEL 7 | jws5-tomcat-native | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2506 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3 on RHEL 8 | jws5-tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2506 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.3 on RHEL 8 | jws5-tomcat-native | Fixed | RHSA-2020:2506 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 10 (Newton) | opendaylight | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | opendaylight | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Process Automation 7 | tomcat | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Runtimes Spring Boot 2.1.15 | tomcat | Fixed | RHSA-2020:3017 |
| Red Hat Software Collections | rh-java-common-tomcat | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7 | 7 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
AV should be Local because the attacker requires a malicious file on a Tomcat server's local filesystem to exploit successfully.
There are sufficient factors beyond the attacker's control: a FileStore must be configured, PersistanceManager must have default value configured for sessionattributeclassnamefilter, local access and paths known. This set of conditions, we feel, reflects AC:H rather than AC:L.
PR should be Low because the attacker requires write privileges to a Tomcat server's filesystem but does not require significantly higher (e.g., administrative) permissions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.