CVE-2021-20322
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw in the processing of received ICMP errors (ICMP fragment needed and ICMP redirect) in the Linux kernel functionality was found to allow the ability to quickly scan open UDP ports. This flaw allows an off-path remote user to effectively bypass the source port UDP randomization. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and possibly integrity, because software that relies on UDP source port randomization are indirectly affected as well.
Statement
This issue is rated as having Moderate impact because of the attack scenario limitation. It is possible to harm the networking services only, but not for the overall system under attack, and impossible to get access to this remote system under attack.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2014230: kernel: new DNS Cache Poisoning Attack based on ICMP fragment needed packets replies
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2021-20322
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20322
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20322
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2022:1975 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2022:1988 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4829 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4835 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
Similar like for the previous CVE-2020-25705, the attack complexity is high, because need to coordinate high amount of attacking machines: like different attackers from different IP addresses attacking together. There are some other limitations too, and more limitations of the attack for this one, than for previous similar CVE-2020-25705.
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Keyu Man, Xin'an Zhou and Zhiyun Qian (University of California, Riverside) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.