CVE-2021-23382
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) vulnerability was found in the npm library postcss when using getAnnotationURL() or loadAnnotation() options in lib/previous-map.js. An attacker can use this vulnerability to potentially craft a malicious CSS to process resulting in a denial of service.
Statement
In Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform (RHOCP), OpenShift ServiceMesh (OSSM) and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes (RHACM) the affected containers are behind OpenShift OAuth authentication. This restricts access to the vulnerable nodejs-postcss library to authenticated users only, therefore the impact is low.
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 delivers the kibana package where the nodejs-postcss library is used, but due to the code changing to the container first content the kibana package is marked as wontfix. This may be fixed in the future.
In Red Had Quay , whilst a vulnerable version of postcss is included in the quay-rhel8 container it is a development dependency only, therefor the impact is low.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1954150: nodejs-postcss: ReDoS via getAnnotationURL() and loadAnnotation() in lib/previous-map.js
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2021-23382
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23382
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23382
Content from snyk.io is not included.https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-POSTCSS-1255640
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift | openshift-logging/kibana6-rhel8 | Fix deferred | |
| OpenShift Service Mesh 2.0 | servicemesh-grafana | Affected | |
| OpenShift Service Mesh 2.0 | servicemesh-prometheus | Affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | grc-ui | Affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | application-ui | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | search-ui | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | console-header | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | console-ui | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | mcm-topology | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 1.2 | postcss | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | kibana | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | golang-github-prometheus-prometheus | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-grafana | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-logging-kibana6 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-thanos-rhel8 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | kibana | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.8 | openshift4/ose-console | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2438 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:3917 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.3 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | Low | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
To successfully exploit this vulnerability an attacker must be able to use "loadAnnotation()" function. Even successful attack won't generate the fully deny access to resources in the impacted component. Hence the Availability (A) metric is set to Low.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.