CVE-2021-31525
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A vulnerability was detected in net/http of the Go standard library when parsing very large HTTP header values, causing a crash and subsequent denial of service. This vulnerability affects both clients and servers written in Go, however, servers are only vulnerable if the value of MaxHeaderBytes has been increased from the default.
Statement
This vulnerability potentially affects any component written in Go that uses net/http from the standard library. In OpenShift Container Platform (OCP), OpenShift Virtualization, OpenShift ServiceMesh (OSSM) and OpenShift distributed tracing (formerly OpenShift Jaeger), no server side component allows HTTP header values larger than 1 MB (the default), preventing this vulnerability from being exploited by malicious clients. It is possible for components that make client connections to malicious servers to be exploited, however the maximum impact is a crash. This vulnerability is rated Low for the following components:
- OpenShift Container Platform
- OpenShift Virtualization
- OpenShift ServiceMesh
- OpenShift distributed tracing components.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1958341: golang: net/http: panic in ReadRequest and ReadResponse when reading a very large header
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native Client for RHEL 7 for Red Hat Storage | heketi | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0308 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/client-kn-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-apiserver-receive-adapter-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-controller-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-in-memory-channel-controller-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-in-memory-channel-dispatcher-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-mtbroker-filter-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-mtbroker-ingress-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-mtchannel-broker-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.16 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-mtping-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2021:2705 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.9 | 5.9 | N/A |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | High | High | N/A |
| Privileges Required | None | None | N/A |
| User Interaction | None | None | N/A |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | N/A |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None | N/A |
| Integrity Impact | None | None | N/A |
| Availability Impact | High | High | N/A |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
AC:H Because either a) servers need to have increased the default setting for MaxHeaderBytes or b) clients need to connect to malicious, attacker-controlled servers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.