CVE-2021-3716
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in nbdkit due to to improperly caching plaintext state across the STARTTLS encryption boundary. A MitM attacker could use this flaw to inject a plaintext NBD_OPT_STRUCTURED_REPLY before proxying everything else a client sends to the server, potentially leading the client to terminate the NBD session. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Statement
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 is not affected by this flaw as it ships an old version of nbdkit (v1.8.0) that does not include support for NBD Structured Replies.
Mitigation
In general, it is recommended to use forced TLS (--tls=require) to avoid MitM attacks in the first place. If opportunistic encryption must be used (--tls=yes), ensure that clients that want to use TLS will request structured replies after the encryption is enabled. If this cannot be done, apply network filtering (e.g., firewall, TCP wrappers, etc.) or use a Unix domain socket instead of TCP to ensure that untrusted clients cannot connect to nbdkit as a MitM attacker.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 1994695: nbdkit: NBD_OPT_STRUCTURED_REPLY injection on STARTTLS
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-924: Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2021-3716
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3716
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3716
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Virtualization for RHEL 8.5.0.Z | virt-devel:av | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0397 |
| Advanced Virtualization for RHEL 8.5.0.Z | virt:av | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0397 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | nbdkit | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | virt-devel:rhel | Fixed | RHSA-2022:1759 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | virt:rhel | Fixed | RHSA-2022:1759 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Advanced Virtualization | virt:av/nbdkit | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Advanced Virtualization | virt:8.2/nbdkit | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Advanced Virtualization | virt:8.3/nbdkit | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | nbdkit | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 | nbdkit | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 3.5 | 3.1 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | High |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | Required | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | Low | Low |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Acknowledgements
This issue was discovered by Eric Blake (Red Hat).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.