CVE-2021-4133
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak version from 12.0.0 and before 15.1.1 which allows an attacker with any existing user account to create new default user accounts via the administrative REST API even when new user registration is disabled.
Statement
This flaw affects only Red Hat Single Sign-on 7.5.0. Red Hat Single Sign-on 7.4.x releases are NOT affected. Fix is available for download from customer portal which can be applied on RH-SSO 7.5.0
Mitigation
Access to the user-creation functionality in the REST endpoint can be deactivated using CLI commands in undertow.
run:
bin/jboss-cli.sh --connect
/subsystem=undertow/configuration=filter/expression-filter=keycloakPathOverrideUsersCreateEndpoint:add( \
expression="(regex('^/auth/admin/realms/(.*)/users$') and method(POST))-> response-code(400)" \
)
/subsystem=undertow/server=default-server/host=default-host/filter-ref=keycloakPathOverrideUsersCreateEndpoint:add()
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2033602: Keycloak: Incorrect authorization allows unpriviledged users to create other users
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2021-4133
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4133
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-4133
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/issues/9247
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | rh-sso-7/sso7-rhel8-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0015 |
| RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | rh-sso-7/sso75-openshift-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0015 |
| RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | rh-sso-7/sso7-rhel8-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0034 |
| RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | rh-sso-7/sso75-openshift-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0164 |
| RHSSO 7.5 async for CVE-2021-4133 | keycloak-services | Fixed | RHSA-2021:5217 |
| RHSSO 7.5.1 | keycloak-services | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0155 |
| Red Hat A-MQ Online | keycloak-services | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.5 for RHEL 7 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2021:5218 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.5 for RHEL 7 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0151 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.5 for RHEL 8 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2021:5219 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.5 for RHEL 8 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2022:0152 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Grzegorz Sobański (MLabs) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.