CVE-2022-20368
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An out-of-bounds access issue was found in the Linux kernel networking subsystem in the way raw packet sockets (AF_PACKET) used PACKET_COPY_THRESH and mmap operations. A local attacker with CAP_NET_RAW capability could use this flaw to trigger a buffer overflow resulting in a system crash or privilege escalation.
Statement
Only local users with CAP_NET_RAW capability enabled can trigger this issue. On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 CAP_NET_RAW capability can be gained by exploiting unprivileged user namespaces.
In a default or common use of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 unprivileged user namespaces are disabled by default, so local unprivileged users cannot abuse namespaces to grant themselves the CAP_NET_RAW capability and potentially elevate their privileges on the system.
Mitigation
The mitigation is to disable CAP_NET_RAW capability for regular users and executables to prevent access to raw packet sockets (AF_PACKET). On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, the mitigation is to either disable unprivileged user namespaces with `sysctl -w user.max_user_namespaces=0` or network namespaces with `sysctl -w user.max_net_namespaces=0`. For more information on how to set sysctl variables on Red Hat Enterprise Linux, please refer to https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2587.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2123695: kernel: net/packet: slab-out-of-bounds access in packet_recvmsg()
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2022-20368
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20368
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2022:7444 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2022:7683 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2024:0930 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2022:7933 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2022:8267 |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2024:0930 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7 | 7.8 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
While PR:H is technically correct because of the CAP_NET_RAW capability requirement, unprivileged users on the system with unprivileged user namespaces enabled (this seems to be default among distributions) can grant themselves CAP_NET_RAW capability easily, so in practice, it's PR:L.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.