CVE-2022-2047
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Eclipse Jetty. When parsing the authority segment of an HTTP scheme URI, the Jetty HttpURI class improperly detects an invalid input as a hostname. This issue can lead to failures in a Proxy scenario.
Statement
In Red Hat Satellite jetty was used to build index files to search documentation. Nowadays in Satellite 6.9 and 6.10 jetty dependency is not in use and there is no access to it, so there is no way this vulnerability can be exploitable. Therefore Satellite supported versions are not affected.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2116949: jetty-http: improver hostname input handling
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2022-2047
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2047
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2047
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-MQ Clients 2 | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| AMQ Broker 7.11.0 | jetty-http | Fixed | RHSA-2023:1661 |
| OpenShift Developer Tools and Services | jenkins | Affected | |
| Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.3.0 | jetty-http | Fixed | RHSA-2023:0189 |
| Red Hat Data Grid 8 | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Decision Manager 7 | jetty-http | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Integration Camel K 1 | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Integration Camel Quarkus 1 | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Integration Service Registry | jetty-http | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 7 | jetty-http | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | jetty-http | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6 | jetty-http | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse Service Works 6 | jetty-http | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Application Runtimes | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | opendaylight | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Process Automation 7 | jetty-http | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6 | lucene4 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6 | puppetserver | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Debezium 1 | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus | jetty-http | Not affected | |
| Red Hat support for Spring Boot | jetty-http | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | High | High |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | Low | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.