CVE-2022-23806
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the elliptic package of the crypto library in golang when the IsOnCurve function could return true for invalid field elements. This flaw allows an attacker to take advantage of this undefined behavior, affecting the availability and integrity of the resource.
Statement
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and 9 are affected because the code-base is affected by this vulnerability.
Red Hat Product Security has rated this issue as having a Moderate security impact. The issue is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; hence, marked as Out-of-Support-Scope.
Red Hat Developer Tools - Compilers (go-toolset-1.16 & 1.17), will not be addressed in future updates as shipped only in RHEL-7, hence, marked as Out-of-Support-Scope.
For additional information, refer to the Issue Severity Classification: https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/ and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle & Updates Policy: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/.
The vulnerability lies in the crypto/elliptic: IsOnCurve taking in negative and invalid forms of data input and resulting in a panic, the resulting invalid data input is also resulting in data sinks in other functions such as marshall that handle elliptic curve cryptography by converting points on an elliptic curve into a binary format for storage or transmission and scalarmult which provides scalar multiplication, all three function takes in invalid forms of data and results in a crash, although the main culprit being isoncurve function, considering the attack complexity being high as the data that reaches the vulnerable function could already be stripped of negative sign and the resultant successful exploitation only leading to a panic/crash the vulnerability has been rated as Moderate.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2053429: golang: crypto/elliptic: IsOnCurve returns true for invalid field elements
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-252: Unchecked Return Value
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/client-kn-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-apiserver-receive-adapter-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-controller-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-in-memory-channel-controller-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-in-memory-channel-dispatcher-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-kafka-broker-controller-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-kafka-broker-dispatcher-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-kafka-broker-post-install-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-kafka-broker-webhook-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| Openshift Serveless 1.22 | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-mtbroker-filter-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:4863 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.1 | 9.1 | N/A |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low | N/A |
| Privileges Required | Low | None | N/A |
| User Interaction | None | None | N/A |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | N/A |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None | N/A |
| Integrity Impact | Low | High | N/A |
| Availability Impact | High | High | N/A |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
The impact to an end-use application such as a Red Hat product (where an attacker does not have arbitrary access to the programming language) is considerably reduced. While this exploit could be used to weaken/disable some encryption algorithms, a panic in golang does not force the entire system to crash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.