CVE-2022-24735
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the Redis database where Lua scripts can be manipulated to overcome ACL rules. This flaw allows an attacker with access to Redis to inject Lua code that executes the potentially higher privileges of another Redis user.
Mitigation
If Lua scripting is not being used, this vulnerability can be mitigated by blocking access to SCRIPT LOAD and EVAL commands using ACL rules.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2080286: redis: Code injection via Lua script execution environment
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2022-24735
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24735
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24735
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2 | redis | Affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | rhacm2/redisgraph-tls-rhel8 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | rhacm2/search-api-rhel8 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 1.2 | redis | Affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Tower 3 | redis | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | redis:5/redis | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | redis:6 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:7541 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | redis | Fixed | RHSA-2022:8096 |
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | io.hawt-hawtio-integration | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | redis | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Software Collections | rh-redis5-redis | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Software Collections | rh-redis6-redis | Fix deferred |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 3.9 | 7.8 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | None |
| User Interaction | Required | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | High |
| Integrity Impact | Low | High |
| Availability Impact | None | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
We consider confidentiality is low as bypassing the rules can only query less relevant data such as versions or other queries allowed by other user, but not critical such as passwords or other important confidential information. Also we consider integrity is low as we could only manipulate information based on the user privileges, but this would not have the capability of manipulating major things to the admin level. The availability is set as none as bypassing the ACL rules should not have any impact on service availability as such. We also see the CVSS score from the developers who are mainting and contributed to fix this vulnerability is syncing with our score here: Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/redis/redis/security/advisories/GHSA-647m-2wmq-qmvq
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.