CVE-2022-28327
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An integer overflow flaw was found in Golang's crypto/elliptic library. This flaw allows an attacker to use a crafted scaler input longer than 32 bytes, causing P256().ScalarMult or P256().ScalarBaseMult to panic, leading to a loss of availability.
Statement
A moderate severity flaw was found in Go’s crypto/elliptic package in the generic P-256 implementation. If a scalar input longer than 32 bytes is supplied, P256().ScalarMult or P256().ScalarBaseMult can panic, causing the application to crash. Indirect uses via crypto/ecdsa and crypto/tls are not affected. This issue impacts availability but does not affect confidentiality or integrity. Only certain platforms (non-amd64, non-arm64, non-ppc64le, non-s390x) may be affected.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, 8 and 9 are affected, because the code-base is affected by this vulnerability.
Red Hat Product Security has rated this issue as having Moderate security impact, and the issue is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, hence, marked as Out-of-Support-Scope.
Red Hat Developer Tools - Compilers (go-toolset-1.16-golang & go-toolset-1.17-golang), ships the vulnerable code and affected by this vulnerability.
For additional information, refer to the Issue Severity Classification: https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/ and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle & Updates Policy: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2077689: golang: crypto/elliptic: panic caused by oversized scalar
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node Healthcheck Operator 0.3 for RHEL 8 | workload-availability/node-healthcheck-rhel8-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6187 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-kubevirt-velero-plugin-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-mustgather-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-rhel8-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-velero-plugin-for-aws-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-velero-plugin-for-csi-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-velero-plugin-for-gcp-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-velero-plugin-for-microsoft-azure-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-velero-plugin-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| OADP-1.1-RHEL-8 | oadp/oadp-velero-restic-restore-helper-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6290 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | 7.5 | N/A |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low | N/A |
| Privileges Required | None | None | N/A |
| User Interaction | None | None | N/A |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | N/A |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None | N/A |
| Integrity Impact | None | None | N/A |
| Availability Impact | High | High | N/A |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.