CVE-2022-3602
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A stack-based buffer overflow was found in the way OpenSSL processes X.509 certificates with a specially crafted email address field. This issue could cause a server or a client application compiled with OpenSSL to crash when trying to process the malicious certificate.
Statement
As per upstream, the most common situation where this can be triggered is when a server requests client authentication after a malicious client connects. A client connecting to a malicious server is also believed to be vulnerable in the same manner. Only OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.6 are vulnerable to this attack. The OpenSSL binaries in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 are compiled with Stack Smashing Protection. Also during the build process, the compiler rearranges the variables in a way that the buffer overflow is only able to overwrite the stack canaries, limiting the maximum impact of this flaw to denial of service. Remote code execution may not be possible in such cases.
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17 does not ship OpenSSL and is not directly affected by the flaw. However, container images which product ship are of RHEL 9 which were affected. RHOSP have fixed this by respining container images through the following errata: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:7429
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2137723: OpenSSL: X.509 Email Address Buffer Overflow
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-119->Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-121: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer leads to Stack-based Buffer Overflow
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2022-3602
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3602
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3602
Content from www.openssl.org is not included.https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221101.txt
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | rhacm2/management-ingress-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | openssl098e | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | openssl098e | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | ovmf | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | compat-openssl10 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | edk2 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | shim | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2022:7288 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | rhel9/openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2022:7384 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | ubi9/openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2022:7384 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | compat-openssl11 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | edk2 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | shim | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Core Services | jbcs-httpd24-openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 3 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Virtualization 4 | redhat-virtualization-host | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Acknowledgements
Upstream acknowledges the OpenSSL project (Polar Bear) as the original reporter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.