CVE-2022-50540
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A logic error was found in the Linux kernel Qualcomm ADM DMA engine driver's slave configuration handling. A local user with privileges to configure DMA operations can trigger DMA slave setup on Qualcomm ADM hardware, causing the driver to use an incorrect size comparison (pointer size instead of struct size) that results in ignoring critical DMA configuration values, which leads to kernel panic and denial of service.
Statement
The issue arises because of an incorrect sizeof operator usage in the slave configuration validation code. The function compares peripheral_size against sizeof(config) where config is a pointer, rather than sizeof(*config) to get the actual structure size. On 64-bit systems, this evaluates to 8 bytes (pointer size) instead of the actual configuration structure size. The comparison always fails, causing the code path that sets the crci (connection request control information) value to be skipped. The crci value is essential for proper DMA channel operation on Qualcomm ADM hardware. When DMA operations proceed with an uninitialized or invalid crci value, the hardware configuration is incorrect and triggers a kernel panic. This occurs reliably on any system using the ADM DMA driver when slave devices attempt to configure their DMA channels—a normal operation during device initialization or data transfer setup. The impact is strictly availability; the kernel crashes before any data transfer occurs, preventing any information disclosure or integrity compromise.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, prevent the qcom_adm module from loading. See https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for instructions on blacklisting kernel modules.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2402204: kernel: dmaengine: qcom-adm: fix wrong sizeof config in slave_config
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-1025: Comparison Using Wrong Factors
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2022-50540
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50540
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50540
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2023:6583 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.