CVE-2023-1664
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available".
This may not impact availability, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality. Considering the environment is correctly set, this flaw is avoidable by configuring the server.
Statement
Red Hat Impact rated as a low impact considering there's a mitigation for this issue which would be consider the environment is correctly set with the truststore file. With these settings, the environment there's no evidence of attack possibility. Also it's possible to track under the server logs for more evidences.
Mitigation
Make sure KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE is correctly set and the logs are not reporting the "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available" after an attempt to explore the vulnerability. Note this message may happen under other scenarios and reasons but the expected behavior would be that a non-valid certificate to pass.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2182196: keycloak: Untrusted Certificate Validation
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-1664
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1664
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1664
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5cc8-pgp5-7mpm
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMQ Broker 7.11.2 | keycloak-core | Fixed | RHSA-2023:5491 |
| Migration Toolkit for Runtimes | org.keycloak-keycloak-core | Affected | |
| RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | rh-sso-7/sso76-openshift-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3888 |
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | keycloak-core | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6 | keycloak-httpd-client-install | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3892 | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3883 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3884 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3885 |
| Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2 | keycloak-core | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus | org.keycloak/keycloak-core | Fix deferred |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | Low |
| Integrity Impact | Low | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Henrik Oehmke (adesso SE) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.