CVE-2023-1664

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available".

This may not impact availability, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality. Considering the environment is correctly set, this flaw is avoidable by configuring the server.

Statement

Red Hat Impact rated as a low impact considering there's a mitigation for this issue which would be consider the environment is correctly set with the truststore file. With these settings, the environment there's no evidence of attack possibility. Also it's possible to track under the server logs for more evidences.

Mitigation

Make sure KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE is correctly set and the logs are not reporting the "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available" after an attempt to explore the vulnerability. Note this message may happen under other scenarios and reasons but the expected behavior would be that a non-valid certificate to pass.

Additional Information

External References

Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1664

Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1664

Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5cc8-pgp5-7mpm

Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata

Products / Services Components State Errata
AMQ Broker 7.11.2 keycloak-core Fixed RHSA-2023:5491
Migration Toolkit for Runtimes org.keycloak-keycloak-core Affected
RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers rh-sso-7/sso76-openshift-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2023:3888
Red Hat Fuse 7 keycloak-core Fix deferred
Red Hat Satellite 6 keycloak-httpd-client-install Not affected
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 Fixed RHSA-2023:3892
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7 rh-sso7-keycloak Fixed RHSA-2023:3883
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8 rh-sso7-keycloak Fixed RHSA-2023:3884
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9 rh-sso7-keycloak Fixed RHSA-2023:3885
Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2 keycloak-core Fix deferred
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown Red Hat NVD
CVSS v3 Base Score 6.5 6.5
Attack Vector Network Network
Attack Complexity Low Low
Privileges Required None None
User Interaction None None
Scope Unchanged Unchanged
Confidentiality Impact Low Low
Integrity Impact Low Low
Availability Impact None None

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Acknowledgements

Red Hat would like to thank Henrik Oehmke (adesso SE) for reporting this issue.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

For open source software shipped by multiple vendors, the CVSS base scores may vary for each vendor's version depending on the version they ship, how they ship it, the platform, and even how the software is compiled. This makes scoring of vulnerabilities difficult for third-party vulnerability databases such as NVD that only provide a single CVSS base score for each vulnerability. Red Hat scores reflect how a vulnerability affects our products specifically.

For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

  • "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
  • "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

A "will not fix" status means that a fix for an affected product version is not planned or not possible due to complexity, which may create additional risk.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

A deferred status means that a fix for an affected product version is not guaranteed due to higher-priority development work.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
  • Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.

What is a mitigation?

A mitigation is an action that can be taken to reduce the impact of a security vulnerability, without deploying any fixes.

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

The listed products were found to include one or more of the components that this vulnerability affects. These products underwent a thorough evaluation to determine their affectedness by this vulnerability. Note that layered products (such as container-based offerings) that consume affected components from any of the products listed in this table may be affected and are not represented.

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

In order to maintain code stability and compatibility, Red Hat usually does not rebase packages to entirely new versions. Instead, we backport fixes and new features to an older version of the package we distribute. This can result in some security scanners that only consider the package version to report the package as vulnerable. To avoid this, we suggest that you use an approved vulnerability scanner from our This content is not included.Red Hat Vulnerability Scanner Certification program.