CVE-2023-2585
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
Keycloak's device authorization grant does not correctly validate the device code and client ID. An attacker client could abuse the missing validation to spoof a client consent request and trick an authorization admin into granting consent to a malicious OAuth client or possible unauthorized access to an existing OAuth client.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2196335: keycloak: client access via device auth request spoof
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-2585
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2585
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2585
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | rh-sso-7/sso76-openshift-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3888 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3892 | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3883 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3884 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3885 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 3.5 | 8.1 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | High | None |
| User Interaction | Required | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | High |
| Integrity Impact | Low | High |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
In order to exploit this following conditions needs to be met
- The victim needs to be tricked into granting consent with an
user_codeto which the attacker has knowledge of thedevice_code. (The "consent" OAuth client can be spoofed, which makes this, in my opinion, a valid attack scenario.) - An attacker can only retrieve access tokens to which the victim previously granted consent.
- All affected OAuth clients need to have the
OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization Grantenabled. CVSS has been scored accordingly
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.