CVE-2023-30861
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the Python Flask package. A cached response may contain data for one client sent by a proxy to other clients, including session cookies, resulting in the compromise of data confidentiality contained in the leak requests or cookies. This happens when the following conditions are met by the proxy's behavior regarding cookies and the application's behavior session usage:
- The caching proxy does not strip or ignore response with cookies
- The application sets a permanent session
- The application does not access or modify the session during requests
- SESSION_REFRESH_EACH_REQUEST is enabled, which is the default Flask behavior
- The application does not set the Cache-Control header to avoid being cached
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2196643: flask: Possible disclosure of permanent session cookie due to missing Vary: Cookie header
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-488: Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-30861
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30861
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-30861
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ironic content for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.11 | python-flask | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3541 |
| Ironic content for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12 | python-flask | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3545 |
| Ironic content for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13 | python-flask | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3536 |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 | python-flask | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 7 | python-flask | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras | python-flask | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3525 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python-flask | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1 | python-flask | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3446 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | python-flask | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3444 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.0 | python-flask | Fixed | RHSA-2023:3440 |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2023:7341 |
| Red Hat Storage 3 | python-flask | Affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.