CVE-2023-3128
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Grafana, which validates Azure AD accounts based on the email claim. On Azure AD, the profile email field is not unique across Azure AD tenants, which enables Grafana account takeover and authentication bypass when Azure AD OAuth is configured with a multi-tenant AzureAD OAuth application. This may allow an attacker to gain complete control of the user's account, including access to private customer data and sensitive information.
Statement
The vulnerability affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and 9 has been categorized as moderate, primarily because Azure Active Directory access is not supported by default in Grafana configurations. Specifically, it remains disabled in the Grafana configuration file located at /etc/grafana/grafana.ini within the Azure AD section. Even if someone were to enable Azure Active Directory access, they retain the option to easily revert it back to the default state, ensuring it remains disabled.
Mitigation
We recommend disabling Active Directory in the Grafana configuration file until a fix is provided.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2213626: grafana: account takeover possible when using Azure AD OAuth
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-3128
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3128
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3128
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryostat 2 | grafana | Not affected | |
| OpenShift Service Mesh 2.1 | servicemesh-grafana | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 | grafana | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 4 | rhceph/rhceph-4-dashboard-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 5 | rhceph/rhceph-5-dashboard-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.1 | ceph | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3925 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | grafana | Fixed | RHSA-2023:6972 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | grafana | Fixed | RHSA-2023:4030 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | grafana | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-grafana | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Storage 3 | grafana | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.