CVE-2023-31582
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Jose4J which allows a malicious user or internal person to erroneously set a low iteration count of 1000 or less to secure the Json Web Token. This could apply to lack of entropy and leave the system less secure.
Statement
This flaw would require manually setting of the number of iterations under 1000 for Json Web Encryption, therefore, a malicious user would need previous access to modify it. Also, a user would still be able to set the variable incorrectly and make the environment less secure for JWE. This is currently rated as a moderate impact.
Mitigation
No mitigation is currently available for this flaw.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2246370: jose4j: Insecure iteration count setting
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-331: Insufficient Entropy
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-31582
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31582
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-31582
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenShift Developer Tools and Services | jenkins-2-plugins | Not affected | |
| OpenShift Serverless | jose4j | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat AMQ Broker 7 | jose4j | Not affected | |
| Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.6.0 | jose4j | Fixed | RHSA-2023:7678 |
| Red Hat Data Grid 8.4.6 | jose4j | Fixed | RHSA-2023:7676 |
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | jose4j | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Integration Camel K 1 | jose4j | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 7 | jose4j | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | jose4j | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | keycloak-adapter-sso7_5-eap6 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 | jose4j | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8 | jose4j | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack | jose4j | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | jenkins-2-plugins | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | jenkins-2-plugins | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Process Automation 7 | jose4j | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 | jose4j | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 3 | jose4j | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2 | jose4j | Affected | |
| Red Hat build of Debezium 2 | jose4j | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus | org.bitbucket.b_c/jose4j | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 2.13.9.Final | org.bitbucket.b_c/jose4j | Fixed | RHSA-2023:7700 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.8 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | None |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.