CVE-2023-34034
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Spring Security's WebFlux framework pattern matching, where it does not properly evaluate certain patterns. A server using path-based pattern matching in WebFlux could allow an attacker to bypass security settings for some request paths, potentially leading to information disclosure, access of functionality outside the user's permissions, or denial of service.
Mitigation
Users of path-based URL determination should ensure that all their patterns have a slash prepended.
example:
pathMatchers("home/**") // vulnerable
pathMatchers("/home/**") // not vulnerable
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2241271: spring-security-webflux: path wildcard leads to security bypass
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-145: Improper Neutralization of Section Delimiters
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-34034
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34034
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34034
Content from spring.io is not included.https://spring.io/security/cve-2023-34034
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Fuse 7.12.1 | spring-security | Fixed | RHSA-2023:7247 |
| Red Hat Integration Camel Quarkus 2 | spring-security | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6 | spring-security | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Process Automation 7 | spring-security | Affected | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 | spring-security | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus | io.quarkus/quarkus-spring-security | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
There are several factors required for a successful exploit of this flaw: a vulnerable version of the component, usage of the webflux framework, usage of path-based security, usage of vulnerable patterns in the code, and no mitigations in place to forestall the vulnerability. These requisite factors, as well as the presence of simple mitigations, are reflected best by Attack Complexity of High rather than Low, and an overall impact of Important rather than Critical.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.