CVE-2023-45866
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the HID Profile in BlueZ that opens doors for unauthorized connections, especially by devices like keyboards, to inject keystrokes without user confirmation. BlueZ lacks proper restrictions on non-bonded devices, creating a risk for attackers that are physically close to inject keystrokes and execute arbitrary commands when the device is in a discoverable state.
Statement
BlueZ was found to inadequately limit non-bonded devices from injecting HID events into the input subsystem. This vulnerability could permit a nearby attacker (physically proximate) to inject keystrokes and carry out arbitrary commands when the device is in discoverable mode.
Mitigation
Put Bluetooth device in non-discoverable mode / disable incoming pairing.
Or
Disable Bluetooth. Instructions on disabling bluetooth in Red Hat Enterprise Linux are available at: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2682931
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2253391: bluez: unauthorized HID device connections allows keystroke injection and arbitrary commands execution
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-287->Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-285: Improper Authentication leads to Improper Authorization
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-45866
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45866
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45866
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | bluez | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | bluez | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bluez | Fixed | RHSA-2024:11154 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bluez | Fixed | RHSA-2024:9413 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Attack Vector | Adjacent Network | Adjacent Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | Low |
| Integrity Impact | Low | Low |
| Availability Impact | Low | Low |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
Successfully exploiting bluez results in some confidentiality loss, but the attacker can't control what information is accessed, limiting the impact. This disclosure doesn't cause a direct, serious loss to the affected component, so confidentiality impact is low.
After exploiting bluez, data modification is possible, but the attacker lacks control over the consequences or extent, resulting in a low integrity impact as the modification doesn't directly and severely affect the component.
While resource availability experiences reduced performance, repeated exploitation doesn't allow the attacker to completely deny service to legitimate users. The impacted component's resources are either partially available consistently or fully available intermittently, resulting in a low availability impact overall.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.