CVE-2023-51780
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A use-after-free flaw was found in the Linux kernel's net/atm/ioctl.c (ATM networking technology driver): do_vcc_ioctl in net/atm/ioctl.c is vulnerable to use-after-free due to a race condition in vcc_recvmsg. This issue can allow an attacker to possibly gain unauthorized access, escalate privileges, or cause the system to crash.
Statement
This issue is considered to be Moderate because there is no known way to trigger kernel panic, only read incorrect buffer size because it occurs in the SIOCINQ call that returns the number of unread bytes in the receive buffer.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, prevent module atm from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2257682: kernel: use-after-free in net/atm/ioctl.c
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-416: Use After Free
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-51780
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-51780
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2950 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3138 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2394 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Will not fix |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7 | 7 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
In this case error happens for skb calculation of amount value. This one not about actual "use after free", but about return incorrect buffer size to reader. It means that local user who want to read amount of data with command like ioctl(<sockfd>, SIOCINQ, &<some_int>) can get potentially incorrect value (as result of race condition). In most cases this should not lead to kernel panic or user software fail, because reader is responsible to read buffer anyway correctly (means should not read more than available). Overall the attack vector is Local and some privileges required (because only local user with some minimum privileges can run ioctl(<sockfd>, SIOCINQ, &<some_int>) or similar request).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.