CVE-2023-52323
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in PyCryptodome/pycryptodomex which may allow for side-channel leakage when performing OAEP decryption, which could be exploited to carry out a Manger attack.
Statement
Red Hat Satellite ship affected version of pycryptodome for pulp_container, however, product is not vulnerable as it doesn't utilize OAEP algorithm technique. Red Hat Product Security has classified its impact as Low for Red Hat Satellite; future updates expected to address this issue.
Red Hat OpenStack 16.1 and 16.2 versions include affected python-scciclient embedded through the python-crypto package, however, python-scciclient employs only one algorithm, which is AES. While the version of python-crypto we ship may be susceptible to a particular CVE, since affected algorithms are not utilized by OpenStack, the attack cannot be executed to exploit an OpenStack deployment
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2257028: pycryptodome: side-channel leakage for OAEP decryption in PyCryptodome and pycryptodomex
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-52323
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52323
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52323
Content from pypi.org is not included.https://pypi.org/project/pycryptodomex/#history
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | python-jose | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | python3x-jose | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8 | python3x-pycryptodomex | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1057 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 9 | python-pycryptodomex | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1057 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | fence-agents | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | resource-agents | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | resource-agents | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2952 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | fence-agents | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2968 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | fence-agents | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2132 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Support | fence-agents | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1155 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | pysnmp | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1 | python-crypto | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | python-crypto | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 | pysnmp | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0 | pysnmp | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.15 for RHEL 8 | python-pycryptodomex | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2010 |
| Red Hat Storage 3 | pysnmp | Out of support scope | |
| Service Telemetry Framework 1.5 | stf/prometheus-webhook-snmp | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.