CVE-2023-53545
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A locking violation was found in the Linux kernel's AMD GPU driver in the context save area cleanup path. A local user can trigger this issue when closing GPU contexts, causing the driver to unmap and remove virtual memory mappings without first reserving the root page directory buffer object. This violates kernel locking rules and triggers lockdep warnings, potentially leading to system instability and denial of service.
Statement
AMD GPUs use a context save area (CSA) to preserve GPU state across context switches. When a process closes its GPU file descriptor, the cleanup code needs to unmap the CSA virtual address and remove it from the GPU's virtual memory system. The amdgpu_vm_bo_del function—which handles this unmapping—requires that the root page directory BO be reserved (locked) before it can safely modify the VM structure. However, the cleanup path in amdgpu_driver_postclose_kms was calling this function without holding the required lock. This creates a race condition window where concurrent GPU operations could be accessing the same VM structures. Lockdep immediately catches this violation and emits warnings. While the immediate symptom is warning messages, the underlying race could cause memory corruption or use-after-free conditions.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, prevent the amdgpu module from being loaded. See https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for instructions on blacklisting kernel modules.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2401539: kernel: drm/amdgpu: unmap and remove csa_va properly
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-366: Race Condition within a Thread
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-53545
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53545
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2394 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.