CVE-2023-53549
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An uncontrolled resource consumption flaw was found in the Linux kernel's netfilter ipset subsystem when processing large batch operations. A local user with CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can trigger this issue by adding or deleting a large number of ipset entries in a single operation, causing the kernel to execute long-running tasks without yielding. This results in soft lockup conditions and denial of service through system unresponsiveness.
Statement
The ipset code processes batch add/delete operations in a tight loop while holding the nfnl mutex. When users specify a large range of IP addresses or ports to add to or remove from a set, the kernel can spend extended periods (potentially seconds) without scheduling, leading to soft lockup detector warnings and system unresponsiveness. Previous attempts to limit the batch size were insufficient—the limits were still too high to prevent hung task conditions on slower systems. Exploitation requires CAP_NET_ADMIN capability, which is typically restricted to root or containers with explicit network administration privileges.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2401491: kernel: netfilter: ipset: Rework long task execution when adding/deleting entries
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-1050: Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a Loop
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-53549
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53549
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53549
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2023:2951 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2023:6583 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.