CVE-2023-53558
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A locking violation was found in the Linux kernel RCU-tasks subsystem's callback list initialization. During system boot, the initialization code calls pr_info() while holding the rtp->cbs_gbl_lock spinlock, causing a potentially sleeping function to be called in atomic context, which results in kernel lockdep warnings and potential deadlock leading to denial of service.
Statement
The issue arises because cblist_init_generic() calls pr_info() while holding the rtp->cbs_gbl_lock spinlock. The pr_info() function calls printk(), which may sleep because it acquires the console_lock and can block waiting for console output. Calling a potentially sleeping function while holding a spinlock violates kernel locking rules and can lead to deadlock. During RCU-tasks initialization at boot time, if lockdep is enabled, the kernel detects this violation and emits an "Invalid wait context" warning showing the problematic lock chain. While this primarily manifests as warnings with lockdep enabled, the underlying locking violation could lead to actual deadlocks in production systems under the right timing conditions.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2401543: kernel: rcu-tasks: Avoid pr_info() with spin lock in cblist_init_generic()
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-1322: Use of Blocking Code in Single-threaded, Non-blocking Context
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-53558
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53558
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53558
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2024:9315 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:11810 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 4.7 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.