CVE-2023-53594
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A reference leak was found in the Linux kernel's driver core device registration logic. When kobject_add fails partway through device_add, the error cleanup attempts to free resources but fails because kobject_add has already cleared the device's parent pointer. This prevents cleanup_glue_dir from finding and releasing the glue directory's reference, causing permanent resource leaks that accumulate with repeated failures and eventually lead to denial of service.
Statement
The device_add function is the core device registration mechanism in Linux. It creates various sysfs structures, including "glue directories" that organize devices within the sysfs hierarchy. The flow looks like this: get_device_parent creates or finds a glue directory (incrementing its reference), sets dev->kobj.parent to point to it, then calls kobject_add to register the device kobject in sysfs. If kobject_add succeeds, everything's fine. But if it fails, it has a side effect: it sets dev->kobj.parent to NULL. The error cleanup then calls get_glue_dir to retrieve the glue directory so it can decrement the reference via cleanup_glue_dir. However, with dev->kobj.parent now NULL, get_glue_dir can't find the glue directory and returns NULL itself. cleanup_glue_dir checks for NULL and does nothing. The glue directory reference acquired earlier is never released.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2401494: kernel: driver core: fix resource leak in device_add()
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-771: Missing Reference to Active Allocated Resource
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-53594
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53594
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53594
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2023:7077 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2023:6583 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.