CVE-2023-53660
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An incorrect object type handling flaw was found in the Linux kernel's BPF cpumap implementation in the cleanup path. A local user can trigger this issue by running XDP redirect operations in SKB mode with the cpumap, causing the cleanup code to incorrectly treat socket buffers as XDP frames when freeing ptr_ring contents. This results in memory corruption and kernel warnings, leading to denial of service through system instability or crash.
Statement
The cpumap is used for XDP (eXpress Data Path) packet processing and can operate in either native XDP frame mode or SKB (socket buffer) mode. When operating in SKB mode, the ptr_ring contains skb pointers rather than XDP frame pointers. However, the __cpu_map_ring_cleanup function assumes all entries are XDP frames and attempts to free them using xdp_return_frame, which causes type confusion when it encounters skbs. This triggers warnings about incorrect XDP memory types and can cause crashes. The issue manifests when running xdp_redirect_cpu in skb-mode, particularly under stress conditions that cause the kthread to stop prematurely. Triggering requires local access and the ability to load and run XDP programs, which typically requires elevated privileges.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2402238: kernel: bpf, cpumap: Handle skb as well when clean up ptr_ring
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-53660
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53660
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53660
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2022:8267 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2394 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.