CVE-2023-53677
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A memory leak flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Intel i915 graphics driver in the selftest page allocation logic. A local user can trigger this issue when running i915 selftests and the fake_get_pages function encounters errors, causing the function to return without freeing previously allocated memory. This results in a permanent memory leak leading to resource exhaustion and denial of service.
Statement
The fake_get_pages function in the i915 selftest code allocates various resources but fails to free them when encountering errors in certain paths. When the function returns early due to error conditions, allocated pages and other structures remain unreleased. Since selftests are typically run during driver testing or validation rather than normal operation, the practical impact is limited to development and testing scenarios. However, if selftests are executed in production environments or during automated testing cycles, the accumulated leaks could cause memory exhaustion.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, prevent the i915 module from being loaded, or avoid running i915 driver selftests until updates are applied. See https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for instructions on blacklisting kernel modules.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2402203: kernel: drm/i915: Fix memory leaks in i915 selftests
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-772: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-53677
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53677
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53677
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2023:7077 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2023:6583 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2394 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.