CVE-2023-53827
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
The MITRE CVE dictionary describes this issue as
Statement
A race in the L2CAP disconnect request/response handlers could access a channel that is being destroyed, causing a use-after-free and kernel crash. The fix uses l2cap_chan_hold_unless_zero() and proper locking around channel deletion to avoid referencing freed objects. An adjacent attacker over Bluetooth can trigger this during disconnect handling on an active link. Likely only denial-of-service kind of attack possible, but cannot prove this. The complexity of attack is high, because it requires a precise race condition between the local channel teardown (triggered by the kernel) and a crafted L2CAP_DisconnectReq or L2CAP_DisconnectRsp message sent by the remote peer at exactly the same time. The timing window is very narrow — the attacker must send or respond to the disconnect while the kernel is already in the process of releasing the l2cap_chan structure but before the reference count reaches zero. Achieving this reliably would require repeated connect/disconnect cycles or fuzzing at the signaling layer, making stable exploitation unlikely outside of a controlled test setup.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2420376: kernel: Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_disconnect_{req,rsp}
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-416: Use After Free
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-53827
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53827
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53827
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3388 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3360 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3360 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Adjacent Network | |
| Attack Complexity | High | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | High | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.