CVE-2023-5517
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the bind package which may result in a Denial of Service in named process. This is a result of a reachable assertion, leading named to prematurely terminate when both conditions are met: nxdomain-redirect for the queried domain is configured and the resolver receives a PTR query, used for a reverse DNS lookup, for a RFC 1918 address that would normally result in an authoritative NXDOMAIN response. A single query matching both conditions can lead to a Denial of Service in the named application.
Statement
The vulnerability in the bind package represents a important severity issue due to its potential to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) in the named DNS server. This flaw arises from a reachable assertion that triggers a premature termination of the named process when specific conditions are met: a domain configured with nxdomain-redirect and a PTR query for an RFC 1918 address. This scenario can lead to a complete failure of the DNS resolution service, disrupting network operations and availability. Given that DNS services are fundamental for network communication and resource accessibility, such an exploit could result in significant service outages, impacting both internal and external systems reliant on the affected DNS server.
Mitigation
To prevent this vulnerability, ensure the `nxdomain-redirect` directive is not present in the `/etc/named.conf` file. Disabling the nxdomain-redirect feature makes the faulty code path impossible to reach, preventing this flaw from being exploitable.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2263897: bind9: Querying RFC 1918 reverse zones may cause an assertion failure when “nxdomain-redirect” is enabled
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-617: Reachable Assertion
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-5517
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5517
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5517
Content from kb.isc.org is not included.https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2023-5517
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | bind | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind9.16 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1781 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support | bind9.16 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1647 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support | bind9.16 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1648 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1789 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1789 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2551 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2551 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | dhcp | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Support | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1800 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Support | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1800 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1803 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1803 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.